Dawn Lane (Raleigh) recently obtained a favorable decision on a Motion for Reconsideration in an uninsured claim in which claimant sustained multiple injuries after being hit by a car in a parking lot.  Our client was named as a defendant under the “piercing of the corporate veil” theory.   Defendant responded to Plaintiff’s initial set of discovery requests, but objected to producing his financial statements.  Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel seeking an Order compelling defendant produce his financial statements, including tax records.  Within just 4 days, the IC inadvertently issued an Order allowing plaintiff’s motion to compel without allowing defendant his ten days to respond.  Defendant immediately filed a response which argued that his financial records are irrelevant and an invasion of his privacy as he was not an employee of the named defendant-employer.   In addition, defendant filed a Motion for Reconsideration as to the Order allowing plaintiff’s Motion to compel.  As a result, the IC issued a modified Order allowing defendant to produce redacted financial statements only.

The outcome of a particular case cannot be predicated upon a lawyer's or law firm's past results.


Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function related_posts() in /home/cshlaw/webapps/cshlaw2016/wp-content/themes/cshlaw-v1.2/single-result.php:51 Stack trace: #0 /home/cshlaw/webapps/cshlaw2016/wp-includes/template-loader.php(74): include() #1 /home/cshlaw/webapps/cshlaw2016/wp-blog-header.php(19): require_once('/home/cshlaw/we...') #2 /home/cshlaw/webapps/cshlaw2016/index.php(17): require('/home/cshlaw/we...') #3 {main} thrown in /home/cshlaw/webapps/cshlaw2016/wp-content/themes/cshlaw-v1.2/single-result.php on line 51