Dan Hartzog, Jr. obtained dismissal of a federal lawsuit alleging that plaintiff was subjected to a hostile work environment in retaliation for protected speech. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted on the grounds that plaintiff’s complaint failed to set forth sufficient facts to assert a hostile work environment claim, as the majority of allegations were conclusory and not supported by proper factual allegations.

The outcome of a particular case cannot be predicated upon a lawyer's or law firm's past results.